From cross-continental train rides to steamer ships, informal learning environments make use of an "on location" setting for instruction, often for extended periods of time, to harness student engagement in an entirely new way. When isolated together in a setting apart from the traditional classroom, students can focus more readily on the subject matter at hand. Additionally, being "in the field" allows ancillary relationships to become visible, and students can witness and explore interrelationships in a way that is impossible under standard classroom conditions.
Issues to consider include:
Informal Settings are typically places where learning takes place outside of a formal classroom, possibly in museums, zoos, aquaria, science and technology centers, homes, and clubs. They are also characterized as places where motivation is internal, the content is variable and possibly un-sequenced, attendance is voluntary, displays and objects are provided, learners are of all ages, and there is more diversity in the learners' backgrounds (Koran & Koran, 1988). Basically, this includes practically anywhere except the formal walls and structure of a traditional school setting.
Thus, educational studies provide a strong argument for the importance of learning in informal settings. Application of appropriate educational learning theories is critical for instruction in informal settings. A firm theoretical foundation offers teachers a starting point from which they can build a series of learning opportunities, responding to all styles and encouraging a wide range of strategies in order to encourage successful learning. Innovative approaches plus access to appropriate technologies can lead to the creation of new learning environments that are flexible and provide a custom education for each student, regardless of class size, time and distance constraints, previous preparation, and personal factors. Selection of appropriate settings and associated technologies should be defined by the desired learning outcomes and students' needs to perform tasks according to their individual styles and strategies. Learning should be interdisciplinary as students expand on prior knowledge, pursue interests, combine information in new ways to solve problems, and reach new understanding of old knowledge. Learning then becomes a dynamic, customized pursuit of new solutions rather than the acquisition of a preconceived package of facts. The proposed course would provide exactly this sort of dynamic, ever-changing yet structured and stimulating learning environment that incorporates reading, listening and viewing.
However, passively hoping that learners will be able to activate appropriate learning strategies in an informal learning environment without guidance is insufficient to ensure successful learning and development. Instead, strategy development and application can be actively included in learning opportunities. In this light, appropriate technologies can enable teachers to provide students with choices as to when, where, and how they access information.
Many educators call for more doing and less talking in our educational system. Finkel (2000) wrote about this extensively in his book called 'Teaching with your mouth shut.' Jean Piaget (1974) and many of his students have shown the importance of direct experience for students in learning. Nearly the whole of our knowledge about the empirical world has come form investigators who had direct experiences with phenomena of nature outside of the formal classroom (Keown, 1986). There is no classroom equivalent to observing a river—clean, clear and healthy as it enters a city—and later to find it green and oxygen deficient with the community of pollution organisms as it leaves the city.
Dierking, L., & Falk, J. (1997, September 1). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact. Curator, 40(3), 211-18.
Finkel, D. L. (2000). Teaching with your mouth shut. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Keown, D. (1986). Teaching science in U.S. schools: A commentary. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(1), 30-32.
Koran, J. J., Koran, M. L., Foster, J. S., & Dierking, L. D. (1988). Using modeling to direct attention. Curator, 31(1), 36-42.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
College of Arts and Humanities I consider teaching a vital part of my persona. I am a firm believer in applying teacher-student collaboration through instruction, research, and service. My teaching practice incorporates concepts and premises that I help learners apply pragmatically. I also believe my teaching functions in conjunction with the...
College of Rosen College of Hospitality Management My goal for the golf and club management curriculum is to build an academic program and reputation that resonates throughout the golf and private club industry. I have highlighted two dimensions of my teaching philosophy complimenting such a goal. My role as a professor is to create an optimal learning environ...
College of Sciences My teaching philosophy has evolved during my 22 years of experience in the university, business, and legal contexts. To be succinct, I am committed to inspiring all persons to become passionate, engaged, lifelong learners who develop the skills to be productive members of our global society. To accomplish this g...